Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac.misc:11957 comp.windows.ms:12592
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ns-mx!ccad.uiowa.edu!cadsi
From: cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Mac Vs. Windows? (sorry)
Message-ID: <1991May12.023111.25863@ccad.uiowa.edu>
Date: 12 May 91 02:31:11 GMT
References: <1991May11.235337.8359@daffy.cs.wisc.edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: CAD-Research, U. of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Lines: 23

From article <1991May11.235337.8359@daffy.cs.wisc.edu>, by carter@cat23.cs.wisc.edu (Gregory Carter):

[lots of stuff deleted]

> Your impression that it takes more Intel machine is correct, intel CPU's
> are brain damaged.
> 
> --Gregory
>  

Well..., Actually DOS is the Brain-Dead part.  The Intel processors are
actually pretty good.  Particurlarly the 386 and above.  I suggest that
the OS over the chips is usually the problem.  BTW, I wonder what makes
you think Intel's toys are Brain-Dead?  BTW, the MAC operating system
is just as Brain-Dead as DOS.  I won't go into detail here, possibly
by e-mail if you wish to rebut.  IMHO there are two GREAT OS's available
at this time:  MACH and OS/2.

|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Tom Hite					|  The views expressed by me |
|Manager, Product development			|  are mine, not necessarily |
|CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc.	|  the views of CADSI.       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|