Xref: utzoo comp.windows.ms:12593 comp.os.msdos.misc:2071 comp.os.os2.misc:1358
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!csri.toronto.edu!wayne
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.os.os2.misc
From: wayne@csri.toronto.edu (Wayne Hayes)
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 is here! vs Windows 3.0 vs NeXT/MACH
Message-ID: <1991May11.224313.2022@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
References: <1991May7.164109.13128@amd.com> <-47gvh+@rpi.edu> <1991May08.011359.12322@comp.vuw.ac.nz> <6648@gssc.UUCP>
Date: 12 May 91 02:43:13 GMT
Lines: 20

In article <6648@gssc.UUCP> timr@gssc.UUCP (Tim Roberts) writes:
>Does the OS/2 2.0 Beta which is now available include PM?  Is it the same as
>the 1.2 PM?  I assume that drivers will have to be rewritten.  Has anyone seen
>an OS/2 2.0 PM SDK yet?

Yes, the Beta version includes PM.  It's quite similar to 1.2 PM.  And no,
drivers do not have to be re-written.  As a matter of fact I'm using a
800x600 SuperVGA driver that was writter for OS/2 1.1.  It looks pretty
lousy, but it's better than 640x480.  I have no idea when the 2.0 SDK will
be available.

>This is a very long palindrome. .emordnilap gnol yrev a si sihT

Oh ya? Well, this is an even longer palindrome. .emordnilap regnol neve na si siht ,lleW ?ay hO

-- 
NOTICE: Due to the complexity of nearly all topics, the opinions expressed
above are in continual process of formation and may be changed without notice.

Wayne Hayes     INTERNET: wayne@csri.utoronto.ca        CompuServe: 72401,3525