Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!ns-mx!ccad.uiowa.edu!cadsi
From: cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: Re: Ms Windows Classes
Message-ID: <1991May13.204928.8219@ccad.uiowa.edu>
Date: 13 May 91 20:49:28 GMT
References: <2191113696@f500.n292.z2.fidonet.org>
Organization: CAD-Research, U. of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Lines: 17

From article <2191113696@f500.n292.z2.fidonet.org>, by Alex_Cleynhens@f500.n292.z2.fidonet.org (Alex Cleynhens):
> In a message of <29 Apr 1991 18:40>, John Munsch (2:292/0) writes:
> 
>  >JM: The chief advantage of BC++ 2.0 over MSC X.X is that it is a C++ 
>  >JM: compiler 
> 
> Sorry: BC is a C++ compiler, but for Windows prg's is a C only.

Except for the fact that for Windows, its a C++ compiler.  This includes
exporting C++ classes in DLL's and whatever you wanna do in
Windows.

|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Tom Hite					|  The views expressed by me |
|Manager, Product development			|  are mine, not necessarily |
|CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc.	|  the views of CADSI.       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|