Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!mintaka!ogicse!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekadg!tonyr
From: tonyr@tekadg.ADG.TEK.COM (Tony Rick)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: X BENCHMARKS
Message-ID: <1260@tekadg.ADG.TEK.COM>
Date: 10 May 91 19:46:55 GMT
References: <307@altos86.Altos.COM>
Reply-To: tonyr@tekadg.ADG.TEK.COM (Tony Rick)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton,  OR.
Lines: 16

In article <307@altos86.Altos.COM> rayb@altos86.Altos.COM ( Ray Barbieri) writes:
>
>So, what is the latest in the X benchmark wars?  Who's is the best and
>most widely accepted?
>
>What ever happend to xbench and xstones?  Are they still around?

I attended an HP Technology conference here this week where one of the
presenters used something called 'x11perf' to compare his box (730?)
with other boxes (Sun, Mips, Dec...).  Does anyone know what this is?
Where it comes from? How to get it?

Tony Rick
Tektronix, Inc.   Beaverton, OR
voice:(503) 627-2942
email:tonyr@tekadg.adg.tek.com