Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!olivea!oliveb!bunker!hcap!hnews!261!1055.0!Mary.Otten
From: Mary.Otten@p0.f1055.n261.z1.fidonet.org (Mary Otten)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: artic 3.03
Message-ID: <15577@handicap.news>
Date: 13 May 91 21:21:19 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.isc-br.com
Reply-To: Mary.Otten@p0.f1055.n261.z1.fidonet.org
Organization: FidoNet node 1:261/1055.0 - The Keeping Room, Baltimore MD
Lines: 16
Approved: wtm@bunker.hcap.fidonet.org

Index Number: 15577

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

Hi Grant. You know, when artic first started, before they ame up with
that stupid locking scheme of theirs, they used to put the licensee's
name and the serial number on the opening screen. Iguess they thought
that wasn't good enough. Idon't know how much money they; lost because
they did that, if loss of money really made them go to the lock system,
but if its all that big a problem, why hasn't Doug had to do wi it with
vocalize, or why hasn't Jaws gone that way? Ithink they lost more good
will than they gained money.

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!261!1055.0!Mary.Otten
Internet: Mary.Otten@p0.f1055.n261.z1.fidonet.org