Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian From: kane@buast7.bu.edu (Brian Kane) Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian Subject: Re: I AM DISGUSTED! Message-ID: Date: 13 May 91 07:13:06 GMT Sender: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu Organization: Boston University Lines: 21 Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.edu [In response to an exchange between Jennifer Irani and John Clark on whether homosexuals pose a threat to the family. --clh] Homosexuals pose no threat to the traditional family. Their numbers, almost certainly less than 25% of the general population, are too small to matter. Two thousand years of proscription have not ended homosexuality, and two thousand years of homosexuality have not affected the traditional family. Besides, the idea that someone's sexuality can be determined by recruitment is completely ridiculous. -----------------------------------CLIP HERE!-------------------------------- * * |Internet: kane@buast7.bu.edu Dazzling * |---or---: kane@buast1.bu.edu Commentary | from... * |Snailnet: Brian Kane * | Boston University ...the Hot Young Star! | Astronomy Dept. * | * | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------