Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!sbcs!csserv2.ic.sunysb.edu!jallen From: jallen@csserv2.ic.sunysb.edu (Joseph Allen) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Memory speed, why so slow? Message-ID: <1991May17.205527.7125@sbcs.sunysb.edu> Date: 17 May 91 20:55:27 GMT References: <9245@idunno.Princeton.EDU> Sender: usenet@sbcs.sunysb.edu (Usenet poster) Organization: State University of New York at Stony Brook Lines: 36 In article raje@lattice.stanford.edu (Prasad Raje) writes: >In article <9245@idunno.Princeton.EDU> ssr@stokes.Princeton.EDU (Steve S. Roy) >asks: >The cell size must get smaller, but the cell capacitance cannot. >Why? >You need a large enough cell capacitance to guard against soft errors due >to radiation. That is you need to store at some minimum number of electrons >per cell. These days this number is in the few tens of thousands of electrons. >The second reason you need a certain minimum charge is to be able to drive >enough of charge onto the bit line. The cell state is sensed by charge sharing >between the dinky cell capacitance (~ 50 fF) and the huge bit line capacitance >( ~ 1 pF). Why is this a problem? Just have more sense amplifiers. Or equivelently, break the dram into small banks (I believe this is done). Also I don't know the exact numbers to calculate it, so which is better: Big cells which don't error Small cells with enough excess so that you can error correct (during refresh perhaps) Hmm that reminds me: I once worked for a company which made character generators for those stupid cable channels. One of the machines used CCD memory. CCD memory is very sensitive to alpha particles I think. Anyway, it made mistakes so often that the user had to look through the text every once in a while to fix things. Of course, no one ever reads those channels so it doesn't really matter. -- /* jallen@ic.sunysb.edu */ /* Amazing */ /* Joe Allen 129.49.12.74 */ int a[1817];main(z,p,q,r){for(p=80;q+p-80;p-=2*a[p])for(z=9;z--;)q=3&(r=time(0) +r*57)/7,q=q?q-1?q-2?1-p%79?-1:0:p%79-77?1:0:p<1659?79:0:p>158?-79:0,q?!a[p+q*2 ]?a[p+=a[p+=q]=q]=q:0:0;for(;q++-1817;)printf(q%79?"%c":"%c\n"," #"[!a[q-1]]);}