Xref: utzoo gnu.misc.discuss:3084 comp.misc:12547 comp.dcom.modems:9717
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!ucsd!mvb.saic.com!ncr-sd!serene!rfarris
From: rfarris@rfengr.com (Rick Farris)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.misc,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: hayes lawsuit
Message-ID: <1991May14.034600.7891@rfengr.com>
Date: 14 May 91 03:46:00 GMT
References: <1991May13.044909.3617@netdev.comsys.com> <TMB.91May13041549@volterra.ai.mit.edu>
Organization: RF Engineering, Del Mar, California
Lines: 14

In article <TMB.91May13041549@volterra.ai.mit.edu> tmb@ai.mit.edu (Thomas M. Breuel) writes:

> To most people "skilled in the art" that I have talked to, this patent
> claim is frivolous; Hayes simply set a standard, but did not "invent"
> any new process or device.

Damn!, if only we had judges that had your understanding of
patent law and technology, wouldn't this be a wonderful
place? 


--
Rick Farris  RF Engineering POB M Del Mar, CA 92014  voice (619) 259-6793
rfarris@rfengr.com     ...!ucsd!serene!rfarris      serenity bbs 259-7757