Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!boulder!daemon
From: C.Chaundy@its.unimelb.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: Bridging and AppleTalk Phase I/Phase II
Message-ID: <35050@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Date: 14 May 91 06:55:03 GMT
Sender: news@boulder.Colorado.EDU
Lines: 23

>Date: Mon, 13 May 91 08:18:24 -0700
>From: Gary Kunis <gkunis@cisco.com>
>Subject: RE: Bridging and AppleTalk Phase I/Phase II
>
>When you explicitly bridge Appletalk, the box will not route phase
>1 or 2.  And you are right, the box acts as a transition gateway
>between segments.

I assume the above comments only apply to boxes running 8.2 onwards?
The next (obvious?) question - if we have a routers running pre-Phase II
gateway code (8.1-21) which are configured to bridge anything that cannot
be routed, what is the best way to prevent Phase II packets from being
passed along with Phase I packets (short of upgrading the gateway code
which is being organized)?

Chris Chaundy

Technical Manager, Networks,
Information Technology Services, The University of Melbourne
Internet: C.Chaundy@its.unimelb.EDU.AU	(DTE 505233430003)
Phone:    +61 3 344 7045  Cables Unimelb
Fax:      +61 3 347 4803  Telex AA35185
Post:     Parkville, Victoria 3052 Australia