Xref: utzoo comp.graphics:18013 news.groups:32005
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!orca!mesa!rthomson
From: rthomson@mesa.dsd.es.com (Rich Thomson)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics,news.groups
Subject: Re: comp.graphics.research [MOD/UNMOD] please vote
Message-ID: <1991May14.185543.23590@dsd.es.com>
Date: 14 May 91 18:55:43 GMT
References: <14870@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU>
Sender: usenet@dsd.es.com
Reply-To: rthomson@dsd.es.com (Rich Thomson)
Followup-To: news.groups
Organization: Design Systems Division, Evans & Sutherland, SLC, UT
Lines: 24
Nntp-Posting-Host: 130.187.85.21

In article <14870@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU>
	jamison@yuma.acns.colostate.edu (Jamie Gulden) writes:
>
>   OK, so lots of us want comp.graphics.research.  The next question:
>
>	Moderated or Unmoderated?
>
>   To help move this forward I am going to take an unofficial vote on
>this subject.

This entire thread belongs in news.groups where such things take
place.  If you want to take a vote on moderation/creation of this
group, it should be done there.  There really isn't much point in
going to all the trouble to take an "unofficial" vote.  Why not just
make the vote official?  Also, since this entire thread has been
taking place in comp.graphics and not news.groups, system administrator
types are probably not aware of this proposal.

						-- Rich
-- 
  ``Read my MIPS -- no new VAXes!!'' -- George Bush after sniffing freon
	    Disclaimer: I speak for myself, except as noted.
UUCP: ...!uunet!dsd.es.com!rthomson		Rich Thomson
ARPA: rthomson@dsd.es.com			PEXt Programmer