Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!biivax.dp.beckman.com!dsroberts
From: dsroberts@biivax.dp.beckman.com
Newsgroups: comp.org.decus
Subject: Re: Should we have kept quiet?
Message-ID: <1991May14.121700.300@biivax.dp.beckman.com>
Date: 14 May 91 19:17:00 GMT
References: <5321@dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> <41@gobi.cs.utexas.edu>
Organization: Beckman Instruments
Lines: 18

In article <41@gobi.cs.utexas.edu>, ctp@cs.utexas.edu (Clyde T. Poole) writes:
> The horse is not near death.  Dispite the fact that the by-laws change
> is before the membership for a vote, the Board at its Monday meeting
> chose to begin implementing part the change while at the same time
> violating its own agreements on how it will conduct business.

Could you elaborate on this for those of us that did not attend symposium, 
Clyde?

BTW, for those of you that have read my previous posting, I hereby modify it in
regards to closing of the vote based on what Clyde posted :-)
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Don Roberts                   Internet:  don@beckman.com
   Beckman Instruments, Inc.     Yellnet:   714/961-3029
   2500 Harbor Bl. Mailstop X-12 FAX:       714/961-3351
   Fullerton, CA  92634          Disclaimer:  Always
---------------------------------------------------------------------------