Xref: utzoo comp.os.os2.misc:1397 comp.periphs.scsi:2618 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!zephyr.ens.tek.com!orca.wv.tek.com!squid!dougc From: dougc@squid.WV.TEK.COM Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.periphs.scsi Subject: Re: Re^2: Adaptec SCSI and OS/2 Message-ID: <10837@orca.wv.tek.com> Date: 15 May 91 22:34:33 GMT References: <1991May15.130945.29984@watson.ibm.com> Sender: nobody@orca.wv.tek.com Reply-To: dougc@squid.WV.TEK.COM () Followup-To: comp.os.os2.misc Lines: 38 In article <1991May15.130945.29984@watson.ibm.com> larrys@ibmman writes: >In , gangwani@andromeda.rutgers.edu (Sunil Gangwani) writes: >>I am one of the frustrated OS/2 device developers struggling with the >>incomplete documentation, buggy debug kernel supplied by Microsoft. [ other typical OS/2 problems deleted to save space ] >Of course, I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt. Your post sounds >like you're another "Unix puke", and if I had half a mind (and my morning >cup of coffee), I'd nuke you, like I did the last guy who tried to >invade. But I'm feeling "kang kai" (Chinese for "generous") this >morning... ;) > >Cheers, >Larry Salomon, Jr. (aka 'Q') LARRYS@YKTVMV.BITNET >OS/2 Applications and Tools larrys@ibmman.watson.ibm.com >IBM T.J. Watson Research Center larrys@eng.clemson.edu >Yorktown Heights, NY > >Disclaimer: The statements and/or opinions stated above are strictly my >own and do not reflect the views of my employer. Additionally, I have a >reputation for being obnoxious, so don't take any personal attacks too >seriously. Regardless of your disclaimer, you *are* speaking in behalf of IBM. Given the efforts that IBM is making to regain it's technical credibility, I don't think they would appreciate you pushing them back into the mainframe mentality days. This kind of response does not belong here, try venting your OS/2 frustrations in alt.flame instead. Regards, Doug. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Doug Carter dougc@orca.wv.tek.com (503) 685-2780 | | Working at, but not for, Tektronix, Network Displays Division. | --------------------------------------------------------------------------