Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!uunet.UU.NET!sef
From: arnold%audiofax.com@mathcs.emory.edu (Arnold Robbins)
Newsgroups: comp.std.unix
Subject: Re: Must POSIX 1003.1 include files be standalone?
Message-ID: <1991May17.182702.9732@uunet.uu.net>
Date: 17 May 91 16:36:33 GMT
References: <1991May12.181445.4553@uunet.uu.net> <1991May17.011208.6853@uunet.uu.net>
Sender: usenet@uunet.uu.net (UseNet News)
Reply-To: arnold@audiofax.com
Organization: AudioFAX, Inc., Atlanta Georgia
Lines: 18
Approved: sef@uunet.uu.net (Moderator, Sean Eric Fagan - comp.std.unix)
Originator: sef@uunet.UU.NET
Nntp-Posting-Host: uunet.uu.net
X-Submissions: std-unix@uunet.uu.net

Submitted-by: arnold%audiofax.com@mathcs.emory.edu (Arnold Robbins)

In article <1991May17.011208.6853@uunet.uu.net> decot@hpcupt1.cup.hp.com (Dave Decot) writes:
>POSIX.1-1991 will *require* that implementations provide stand-alone
>headers.  In addition, a program will need to include *at most* one header
>in order to use a particular function (the one that contains the prototype
>for the function).

Er, what is POSIX-1.1991?  Didn't we just get through getting POSIX-1.1990?
-- 
Arnold Robbins				 AudioFAX, Inc. | Threads are the
2000 Powers Ferry Road, Suite 200 / Marietta, GA. 30067 | lack of an idea.
INTERNET: arnold@audiofax.com  Phone:   +1 404 618 4281 |     -- Rob Pike
UUCP:	  emory!audfax!arnold  Fax-box: +1 404 618 4581 |

[ Another year, another standard.  -- mod ]

Volume-Number: Volume 23, Number 74