Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!mini!ditka!zorch!hico2!sonyd1.Broadcast.Sony.COM!blilly.UUCP!bruce
From: bruce@balilly (Bruce Lilly)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1
Subject: Re: unix-pc rmgroup due next week
Summary: Nuke the buggers.
Message-ID: <1991May15.225446.8128@blilly.UUCP>
Date: 15 May 91 22:54:46 GMT
References: <100419@becker.UUCP> <53348@rphroy.UUCP> <53349@rphroy.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@blilly.UUCP (News Administrator)
Organization: Bruce Lilly, Flushing, NY
Lines: 15
Nntp-Posting-Host: balilly

In article <53349@rphroy.UUCP> rhaar@gmr.com writes:
>In article <53348@rphroy.UUCP>, tkacik@hobbes.cs.gmr.com (Tom Tkacik CS/50) writes:
>|> In article <100419@becker.UUCP>, bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce D. Becker) writes:
>|> |> In article <53168@rphroy.UUCP> tkacik@hobbes.cs.gmr.com (Tom Tkacik CS/50) writes:
>|> |> |In article <100166@becker.UUCP>, bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce D.  Becker) writes:
>|> |> ||> In article <1991May10.194046.19312@bagend.uucp> jan@bagend.uucp (Jan Isley) writes:

[ No, I'm not going to include the entire transcript of this thread ]

The unix-pc groups are going to be rmgrouped. That was part of the vote.
If Mr. Becker wishes to ignore the rmgroup and keep those groups on his
machine, that's his prerogative. Alternatively, he can wait a month or so
and issue a call for discussion to re-create the groups.
-- 
	Bruce Lilly		blilly!balilly!bruce@sonyd1.Broadcast.Sony.COM