Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!templar!jbickers
From: jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz (John Bickers)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: 8-bit death
Message-ID: <3722.tnews@templar.actrix.gen.nz>
Date: 14 May 91 18:52:08 GMT
References: <3626.tnews@templar.actrix.gen.nz> <1991May12.181436.20304@NCoast.ORG> <3691.tnews@templar.actrix.gen.nz> <1991May13.170515.10233@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Organization: TAP, NZAmigaUG.
Lines: 14

Quoted from <1991May13.170515.10233@sugar.hackercorp.com> by peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva):
> In article <3691.tnews@templar.actrix.gen.nz> jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz (John Bickers) writes:
> >     Nevertheless, hidden. I haven't noticed an intfoo() function in
> >     a Unix compiler yet.
> 
> System V/386. The call is sysi86().

    And on an Intel CPU! We all know the thing about dead bunnies and
    straws, eh? Is this one reason why?

> Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
--
*** John Bickers, TAP, NZAmigaUG.        jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz ***
***         "Endless variations, make it all seem new" - Devo.          ***