Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!stanford.edu!eos!aio!alamo!ipolyi
From: ipolyi@alamo.Berkeley.EDU (Harold H. Ipolyi 713-486-6444)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Anyone actually own an 040 Amiga?
Message-ID: <1991May14.083155@alamo.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 14 May 91 13:31:55 GMT
References: <1991May9.202323.5208@sbcs.sunysb.edu> <o#3H6uz@cs.psu.edu> <1991May13.113026@alamo.Berkeley.EDU> <1991May13.190307.4383@wam.umd.edu>
Sender: news@aio.jsc.nasa.gov (USENET News System)
Reply-To: ipolyi@alamo.Berkeley.EDU (Harold H. Ipolyi 713-486-6444)
Organization: nasa-jsc
Lines: 19

In article <1991May13.190307.4383@wam.umd.edu>, ddev@wam.umd.edu (Don
DeVoe) writes:
       [deleted]
|> >Conversly, the C=64 I bought 6-7 years ago for $395.- is now worth
|> >between $1150.- to $1500.-
|> >The Amiga1000 I bought when it came out for $1500.- would be worth
the
|> >same if I were brain-dead enough to want to sell it.
       [deleted]
|> I must have missed something...this WAS a joke, right? (Or perhaps an
|> intentional jab from a NeXT owner trying to make amiga owners look
silly?)
|> Don DeVoe                       
|> ddev@wam.umd.edu 

Sorry, but you did miss it. The was to (Michael D Mellinger) making
claims on NeXT's possible value. The prices I am quoting are what ANYONE
can at these moment (until the end of June) for ANY of the listed
Commodore product in the Power-Up program (I have an A3000). H