Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!news
From: melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: An interesting idea...
Message-ID: <==1H9&f5@cs.psu.edu>
Date: 16 May 91 00:50:22 GMT
References: <91134.022556MBS110@psuvm.psu.edu> <l46Hdbr4@cs.psu.edu>
	<1991May15.112103.22087@sugar.hackercorp.com>
	<1991May15.171002.23789@milton.u.washington.edu>
Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Lines: 10
In-Reply-To: stevep@wrq.com's message of 15 May 91 17: 10:02 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: sunws5.sys.cs.psu.edu


In article <1991May15.171002.23789@milton.u.washington.edu> stevep@wrq.com (Steve Poole) writes:

   I was under the impression that the NeXT frame buffer scheme did allow
   double buffering, at least on the 16-bit color implementation.  Wrong?

I heard something about double-buffering but it might have been in
reference to the NeXT Dimension board.  I'll check into it.

-Mike