Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!mips!news.cs.indiana.edu!ariel.unm.edu!triton.unm.edu!nwickham From: nwickham@triton.unm.edu (Neal C. Wickham) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: Blitter vs. 040 (was: Computer Architecture question Message-ID: <1991May16.103739.21041@ariel.unm.edu> Date: 16 May 91 10:37:39 GMT References: <1991May16.045252.7706@NCoast.ORG> <7haHkcs5@cs.psu.edu> Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Lines: 24 In article <7haHkcs5@cs.psu.edu> melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes: > > >Well, NCW was following the converstation a while back. Did he go >home for the summer? > > >-Mike I didn't say anything about NeXT not being able to do animation. I know very little aboutcomputers and have kept most of my post in the area of psychology and marketing ...'m a civil engineeri majo I did make some comments that animation wa beingwritten abo an advertise a lot in my engineering magazine I think you, when talking about DPS said, t said that the only problem with it was that it wouldn't do animation very NCW w