Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!pacbell.com!ucsd!nosc!crash!crash!pnet01!uzun
From: uzun@pnet01.cts.com (Roger Uzun)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.games
Subject: Re: My comparison of DM to Eye of Beholder
Message-ID: <1991May17.063609.29680@crash.cts.com>
Date: 17 May 91 06:36:09 GMT
Sender: root@crash.cts.com (Bill Blue)
Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon CA
Lines: 27

[
I played through DM and Chaos Strikes back on the Amiga, I have played almost
through Eye of the Beholder on the Amiga and have played Eye on the PC (a 33
Mhz 80386)
Comparing Eye on my A3000/25 to the 386 33mhz PC version

Graphics on Amiga version are almost as good, not quite but very close.
Sound on Amiga version is EXCELLENT.
Speed is better on the amiga version and no annoying wait while
spell is animated, there is a wait on the PC version.

Comparing DM and CSB to Eye

Eye has better gameplay and I like its rules better
Eye has better graphics and better sound
Eye is shorter and not as challenging, but it is a beginning scenario
Eye is HD installable runs under 2.0x and on the A3000 works fine.


I stongly recommend this fine port of a fine product, for all
Amiga users.  It is a lot of fun.

-Roger

UUCP: {hplabs!hp-sdd ucsd nosc}!crash!pnet01!uzun
ARPA: crash!pnet01!uzun@nosc.mil
INET: uzun@pnet01.cts.com