Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!csn!boulder!happy.colorado.edu!kskelm
From: kskelm@happy.colorado.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: 2.0 Compatibility problem
Message-ID: <1991May14.152100.1@happy.colorado.edu>
Date: 14 May 91 21:21:00 GMT
References: <4766@orbit.cts.com> <dillon.7191@overload.Berkeley.CA.US> <21541@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Sender: news@colorado.edu (The Daily Planet)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 26
Nntp-Posting-Host: happy

In article <21541@cbmvax.commodore.com>, jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup) writes:
> 	A slight exaggeration.  I'd guess more like 90% of what you'd find
> at, say, the King of Prussia B. Daltons' Software, including some pretty
> ancient and horrible games.  How would I know that?  Should be easy to guess...

   OK.  Here we come to an interesting problem.  I've been told time and
again by EVERYONE, that there is no functional hardware difference between
a 3000 and earlier machines (beyond the new enhancements, obviously).

   The problem is this: my software package runs on EVERY machine under 1.3,
and I worked to get it 2.0 compatible, which it IS, on every machine BUT the
A3000.  That is, it works FINE on a 3000 under 1.3, but not 2.0; An A3000/2.0
is the ONLY platform it refuses to run on.

   Any ideas there?

  Appreciate your time,

     Kevin Kelm
+------------------------------------------------------------+
|      ///  Kevin "Visionary will be done RSN" Kelm          |
|     ///  kskelm@happy.colorado.edu                         |
| \\\/// "Reality is subjective-- if you can make your own,  |
|  \XX/ then who's crazy? That's entertainment software!"-me |
| C code run.  Run, code, run--PLEASE!                       |
+------------------------------------------------------------+