Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!linac!mp.cs.niu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!dat33228
From: dat33228@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Derek A. Taubert)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: ACCELERATOR - ZIP OR TRANSWARP?
Message-ID: <1991May16.074027.28758@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 16 May 91 07:40:27 GMT
References: <730@generic.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Lines: 17

In article <730@generic.UUCP> ericmcg@pnet91.cts.com (Eric Mcgillicuddy) writes:
>My opinion is Zip GS, it is a bit faster, is just as easy to install, runs
>coller, and is much easier to upgrade yourself.

Ok, ok...  Sure, it runs cooler, but a bit faster?  Come on folks...  Until
someone produces some HARD evidence that a 7 MHz Zip runs faster than a 7 MHz
Transwarp GS, I would really appreciate it if we layed off of the AE bashing.

I have my problems with AE too, but this is stupid.

Derek (A satisfied TWGS owner)
--
+ Derek Taubert --> derek@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu + Author of : GScii+	      +
+		    dat33228@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu  + and the world's most useless +
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ desk accessory -> Amaze me   +
+ There are MOUSE technotes?    +  *******8-)  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ Ask me about my GS load meter +  ^^^^^^^^^^ Marge Simpson                   +