Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!olivea!apple!agate!darkstar!ucscb.UCSC.EDU!unknown
From: unknown@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (The Unknown User)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: ACCELERATOR - ZIP OR TRANSWARP?
Message-ID: <15919@darkstar.ucsc.edu>
Date: 17 May 91 09:52:56 GMT
References: <737@generic.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@darkstar.ucsc.edu
Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz; Open Access Computing
Lines: 16


In article <737@generic.UUCP> ericmcg@pnet91.cts.com (Eric Mcgillicuddy) writes:
>[chop chop] The
>problem is finding a test that would convince everyone one way or the other.
>None of the published benchmarks have convinced me on other machines, so I
>don't see it working here. 

	Why wouldn't it convince you here?

	The same CPU is being used, just different speeds and caches...
Seems like standard benchmarks should work.. you're running the EXACT same
code on both.
-- 
/unknown@ucscb.ucsc.edu       Apple IIGS Forever!        unknown@cats.ucsc.edu\
|WANT to help get ULTIMA VI //e or GS written?-mail me. CHEAP CD info-mail me.|
\                    It's a Late Night World.... Of Love                     /