Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbfsb!cbnewsb.cb.att.com!mbb
From: mbb@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (martin.brilliant)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: COMPUADD Info, Please.
Message-ID: <1991May16.155919.5849@cbfsb.att.com>
Date: 16 May 91 15:59:19 GMT
References: <1991May15.203626.3835@ms.uky.edu>
Sender: news@cbfsb.att.com
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 19

From article <1991May15.203626.3835@ms.uky.edu>, by tek@ms.uky.edu (Thomas E. Kunselman):
> If anyone has experience with COMPUADD, could you please  let me know
> what sort of reputation they have?  I have a friend who says that he
> loves his compuadd, and had great service from them.  Someone else has told
> me that the Industry Reputation of Compuadd is that their machines are made
> to last no longer than two years.

"Someone else": who?  That sounds like something an unscrupulous
competing salesman would say, not like a feasible design criterion.
You can design tires for a specific life, but not computers.

I've dealt with CompuAdd, and had no problems.  That doesn't mean much
in itself, because most products shipped work anyway; you want to find
out about the few that don't.  But a handful of satisfied customers,
and no complaints, is a fair indication.

							Marty
marty@hoqax.att.com		hoqax!marty
Martin B. Brilliant		(Winnertech Corporation)