Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!think.com!mintaka!ghoti!cjeff From: cjeff@ghoti.lcs.mit.edu (Carl J.M. Alexander) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware Subject: Re: Mac hard disks/orientation Message-ID: <1991May16.134953.28442@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> Date: 16 May 91 13:49:53 GMT References: <1991May12.032032.20327@midway.uchicago.edu> <2772@kielo.uta.fi> Sender: news@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu Organization: BCS*Mac Lines: 23 In article <2772@kielo.uta.fi> ccjapu@kielo.uta.fi (Jarmo Puntanen) writes: >In article hoepfner@heawk1.gsfc.nasa.gov (Patrick Hoepfner) writes: >> >> Laying any Mac II, Mac IIx, or Mac IIfx on its side is dangerous! >>This is because the hard disk is mounted with the read/write arm >>mounted sideways. This means that when you lay the Mac on its side >>the read/write arm is forced to move against gravity. This wears the >>arm out quicker..... > >To state that laying *any* Mac II or IIx (or any Mac for that matter) >on its side is dangerous is simply not true. >Quite a number of those machines have Seagate hard >disks, whose installation manual (Universal Installation Handbook, >Seagate Publication 36042-001, Rev D.) reads (p. 12): "The drive may be >mounted horizontally ... or on either side (egde)." Am I the *only* person who remembers that the reason Apple told us not to put Mac IIs up on end was that it defeats the cooling design? --Carl Alexander News Editor, The Active Window cjeff@ghoti.lcs.mit.edu