Xref: utzoo comp.mail.mh:1771 comp.sys.mips:1629 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!pa.dec.com!hollie.rdg.dec.com!jch From: jch@hollie.rdg.dec.com (John Haxby) Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh,comp.sys.mips Subject: Re: Problems with mh on MIPS M120/5 Message-ID: <1991May14.084223.8177@hollie.rdg.dec.com> Date: 14 May 91 08:42:23 GMT References: <1991May9.180015.728@mother.bates.edu> <1991May13.210610.8999@agate.berkeley.edu> Sender: news@hollie.rdg.dec.com (Mr News) Reply-To: jch@hollie.rdg.dec.com (John Haxby) Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 29 In article <1991May13.210610.8999@agate.berkeley.edu>, gnn@minestrone.Berkeley.EDU (George Neville-Neil) writes: |> In article <1991May9.180015.728@mother.bates.edu>, rob@mother.bates.edu (Rob Spellman) writes: ... |> |> > Date: Thu, 09 May 91 13:48:36 D |> |> ^^^ |> |> > |> |> > Look at the date this message was sent! |> |> |> |> The time zone is a little messed up. It should be EDT! ... |> The bug has been reported to MIPS. Of course, according to RFC1123, the timezone should be -0400 (or whatever EDT is); D is RFC822 for "-0400" I suspect. The year should also be 1991 and not 91, also according to RFC1123, in anticipation of the millenium. -- John Haxby, Definitively Wrong. Digital Reading, England <...!ukc!wessex!jch> ---------------------------------------------------------------- The opinions expressed herein are my own, not my employers.