Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!batcomputer!THEORY.TC.CORNELL.EDU!finn From: finn@THEORY.TC.CORNELL.EDU (Lee Samuel Finn) Subject: Re: Why NextStep is not on RS/6000 Message-ID: <1991May17.143137.24913@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> Sender: news@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: theory.tn.cornell.edu Organization: Cornell Theory Center References: <1991May16.212049.19976@menudo.uh.edu> Date: Fri, 17 May 1991 14:31:37 GMT In article <1991May16.212049.19976@menudo.uh.edu> mahmoud@csund.cs.uh.edu () writes: >Rumor on why IBM is not very enthusiastic >about NeXTstep on its RS/6000 workstion. > >An IBM rep told me the other day that it is not IBM that >Is not enthusiastic but its Mr. Steve Jobs that is holding out on >IBM. The story is that even though IBM gave steve 10 million++ >for NeXTstep to run on its workstations he now claims that >he sold them a license for NS1.0 only and not for NS2.0. >Also it seems like he does not want them to have color. >It seems like he is trying to milk them out of more money and >they are pretty pissed. The IBM rep said that they are willing >to sell NeXTstep for the RS/6000 but they are not willing to >look bad and sell the old version of NS. So he said the only >way is for steve to come to his senses and be happy with >his 10 mill. ++ and not be tooooooo greedy. >I have no idea if he was telling the truth or what...has anyone heard >this before.....also it this is true we should mail steveeee baby >a note(s) that we want to see NS2.0 on the RS/6000 and every other >machine that can handle it......ahmed > > Two comments: 1) As labeled, this is rumor (and from an IBM rep --- not an impartial source), and 2) I'm not certain that NeXT would be in the wrong here: were these the terms of the contract? What would IBMs revenue be if they were to pay the money to license NS2.0? Is the fee exorbitant? I don't know the answers to these questions, but I'm not willing to condemn ``steveee baby'' as a merciless Simon Le Gree for trying to squeeze a few bucks out of poor, innocent, IBM --- if in fact that is what is happening and it is not some other, more likely story.