Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!unixhub!slacvm!jmh
From: JMH@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Publisher's Powerpak
Message-ID: <91134.072304JMH@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>
Date: 14 May 91 15:23:04 GMT
References: <1991May13.223601.21467@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Lines: 10

I have been using Powerpac for about 8 months with 2 different printers/
computer combinations.  With a 16MHz 386SX/Epson Lq800 I found PP to be
very slow. Recently got a 33MHz 486/Lazer printer, and PP is great with
that combo. Some graphics packages require you switch out PP to print.
   ________                   Jim Hodgers
  /___()___\                  JMH@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU
  \ ______ /                  May your faithful saint bernard
   \ ____ /                   run away with your yellow Alfa Romeo
    \____/                    (Found in a fortune cookie)
Disclaimer -  Who said I could have an opinion ??? Certainly NOT SLAC!!