Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!udel!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!dftsrv!oneel From: oneel@heawk1.gsfc.nasa.gov ( Bruce Oneel ) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: Ms Windows Classes Message-ID: Date: 14 May 91 13:07:48 GMT References: <2191113696@f500.n292.z2.fidonet.org> Sender: news@dftsrv.gsfc.nasa.gov Organization: STX/GSFC Nasa Lines: 22 In-reply-to: Alex_Cleynhens@f500.n292.z2.fidonet.org's message of 9 May 91 17:55:00 GMT In article <2191113696@f500.n292.z2.fidonet.org> Alex_Cleynhens@f500.n292.z2.fidonet.org (Alex Cleynhens) writes: In a message of <29 Apr 1991 18:40>, John Munsch (2:292/0) writes: >JM: The chief advantage of BC++ 2.0 over MSC X.X is that it is a C++ >JM: compiler Sorry: BC is a C++ compiler, but for Windows prg's is a C only. alex Boy, that's a suprise. Borland put out a magazine called Borland Language Express with C++ classes for windows in it. They worked. Some of the examples which came with BC were in C++ and they worked, and I've been writing c++ code for windows for 2 months and it seems to work. On the other hand, all the Microsoft documentation does assume you're using C... bruce -- Bruce O'Neel oneel@heasfs.gsfc.nasa.gov NASA/GSFC/STX/Code 664