Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!gatech!hubcap!ncrcae!ncr-sd!SanDiego.NCR.COM!booboo!davel
From: davel@booboo.SanDiego.NCR.COM (David Lord)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: Re: Ms Windows Classes
Message-ID: <1991May14.163037.26448@donner.SanDiego.NCR.COM>
Date: 14 May 91 16:30:37 GMT
References: <2191113696@f500.n292.z2.fidonet.org>
Sender: news@donner.SanDiego.NCR.COM (News Owner)
Reply-To: davel@booboo.SanDiego.NCR.COM (David Lord)
Organization: NCR Corporation, Rancho Bernardo
Lines: 12

In article <2191113696@f500.n292.z2.fidonet.org> Alex_Cleynhens%f500.n292.z2@hippo.dfv.rwth-aachen.de (Alex Cleynhens) writes:
>In a message of <29 Apr 1991 18:40>, John Munsch (2:292/0) writes:
>
> >JM: The chief advantage of BC++ 2.0 over MSC X.X is that it is a C++ 
> >JM: compiler 
>
>Sorry: BC is a C++ compiler, but for Windows prg's is a C only.
>
>alex

Expect a lot of flames over that statement. Having Written C++ Windows
programs using Borland C++ I can guarantee that you are mistaken.