Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89!William.Wilson From: William.Wilson@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (William Wilson) Newsgroups: misc.handicap Subject: Re: braille reading Message-ID: <15658@handicap.news> Date: 15 May 91 16:59:30 GMT Sender: wtm@bunker.isc-br.com Reply-To: William.Wilson@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org Organization: FidoNet node 1:129/89 - BlinkLink, Pittsburgh PA Lines: 45 Approved: wtm@bunker.hcap.fidonet.org Index Number: 15658 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] MD> different, you read one with vision and you read the other with MD> your fingers. That's the difference I see. And, a sighted MD> person who reads print may be able to temporarily store MD> information for a couple of seconds that was input MD> visually--but who's to say Braille readers can't do that, Margo, Not I! In fact, I said in my message that I suspected a sensory storage of tactile information existed just as there is iconic memory! That is why I said we are comparing apples and oranges! Since with sight the total visual field is stored for the duration of the iconic memory, it can contain as much as the eye is capable of sensing in that amount of time. This, like it or not, is considerably more than even the quickest hands could cover in a similar amount of time, so there is more available for higher level processing such as recognition, contextual information gathering, and so on with sight! It is just in the nature of the beast. MD> what's the big deal anyway? Isn't the purpose of reading to MD> comprehend and to remember at least the essence of the text for MD> a while--longer than a few seconds in many cases? No, I don't think it is in many cases, I think it is in all cases! I guess that is why I ended my message saying almost exactly that and stating how I did much better in school after losing my sight than I had done as a visual reader! Likewise, I said in my message how difficult it would be to conduct a valid experiment comparing braille and print reading, so except for me believing that a greater amount of information put into sensory storage could result in a larger amount available for short term memory, and thus even long term memory if desired, we agree on everything. That's a high enough percentage for me Margo, so I'm done with this one! Willie ... BlinkTalk, Dr. Deb and Silver in Pittsburgh! -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89!William.Wilson Internet: William.Wilson@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org