Xref: utzoo sci.space.shuttle:7825 rec.aviation:36198
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!mizar.usc.edu!sharp
From: sharp@mizar.usc.edu (Malcolm Sharp)
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,rec.aviation
Subject: Re: Edwards as primary site
Message-ID: <32809@usc>
Date: 13 May 91 14:02:48 GMT
References: <72189@microsoft.UUCP> <1991May12.182355.13384@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>
Sender: news@usc
Followup-To: sci.space.shuttle
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 10
Nntp-Posting-Host: mizar.usc.edu

If Edwards then is the best landing site, why not use Vandenberg
is the space port?   Is it because of the obvious things:  no
port there, infrastructure in place at KSC,  no $$ savings,
launches would take place over land mass??

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Malcolm Sharp
Coordinator, Instructional/Technical Support
University of Southern California