Xref: utzoo alt.msdos.programmer:2683 comp.emacs:10739
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ra!uvaarpa!murdoch!usenet
From: randall@Virginia.EDU (Randall Atkinson)
Newsgroups: alt.msdos.programmer,comp.emacs
Subject: Re: EMACS
Message-ID: <1991May18.160353.25023@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Date: 18 May 91 16:03:53 GMT
References: <NELSON.91May14222846@sun.clarkson.edu> <JOHN.91May16230345@gna.axis-design.fr> <28342a28.48a8@petunia.CalPoly.EDU>
Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Followup-To: alt.msdos.programmer
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Virginia
Lines: 11


In article <28342a28.48a8@petunia.CalPoly.EDU>,
	Eric Horne <ehorne@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> writes:

>Isn't Freemacs/ Micro Emacs a disk/memory hog just like the Unix Version?

No, and neither is JOVE.  For that matter, the part of GE where I used
to work used MicroEMACS on all its systems (including DOS, VMS, and
UN*X).  There is no single "Unix version."  There are other
implementations of EMACS for DOS as well as those mentioned here, but
I haven't used them and I try to avoid wild speculation.