Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c++:13533 comp.std.c:4849
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!ogicse!intelhf!ichips!inews!pima!bhoughto
From: bhoughto@pima.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Pointers to functions
Message-ID: <4285@inews.intel.com>
Date: 18 May 91 08:23:47 GMT
References: <1512@caslon.cs.arizona.edu> <4253@inews.intel.com> <dpg.674453898@extro>
Sender: news@inews.intel.com
Organization: Intel Corp, Chandler, AZ
Lines: 14

In article <dpg.674453898@extro> dpg@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (D P Gilbert) writes:
>Wouldn't it be nice just to write the function name
>without those parentheses (e.g. token.get instead of
>token.get() ).
>I know this amounts to heresy ... apologies in advance

Ob. response:

	If you want Pascal, you know where to find it.

				--Blair
				  "I don't want it, and come
				   to think of it, I don't
				   know where to find it..."