Xref: utzoo gnu.misc.discuss:3152 comp.misc:12615 comp.dcom.modems:9833
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!haven.umd.edu!decuac!grebyn!escom!al
From: al@escom.com (Al Donaldson)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.misc,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: hayes lawsuit
Message-ID: <1991May19.202355.10002@escom.com>
Date: 19 May 91 20:23:55 GMT
References: <TMB.91May13041549@volterra.ai.mit.edu> <1991May19.123246.6857@unlinfo.unl.edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: ESCOM Corporation
Lines: 12

In article <1991May19.123246.6857@unlinfo.unl.edu>, riddle@hoss.unl.edu (Michael H. Riddle) writes:
> The Congress, not the courts, is the proper place to challenge the law.
> If enough congress.critters can be convinced, you can get the law changed
> to read the way you want it to read.

Not very likely, since congress critters are predominately lawyers
who almost never do anything to jeopardize business for other lawyers..

Just my personal point of view, but since I own this company it is
also the corporate point of view.

Al