Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!jarthur!nntp-server.caltech.edu!nyet From: nyet@nntp-server.caltech.edu (n liu) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc Subject: Re: MS-DOS 5.0 Message-ID: <1991May20.004337.1710@nntp-server.caltech.edu> Date: 20 May 91 00:43:37 GMT References: <1991May19.103341.10003@nntp-server.caltech.edu> <1991May19.143755.8825@nntp-server.caltech.edu> Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Lines: 34 heathh@roo (Heath Ian Hunnicutt) writes: >In article <1991May19.103341.10003@nntp-server.caltech.edu> >nyet@nntp-server.caltech.edu (n liu) writes: >> I too have been "unofficially" testing dos 5.0 and have a question about >> its share.exe >> >> If you don't load it, it doesn't warn about "large media". Unlike dos 4.01, >> if its in your root dir (or shell directory), it does not appear to get ... >The only way to properly load SHARE.EXE is to place it in your C:\ directory, >where it is loaded on boot-up along with IBMBIO.COM and IBMDOS.SYS. I don't >know whether 5.0 has fixed the FCB problem with big drives or not, but it is >worth mentioning here that DOS 4.01 would only stop complaining about SHARE if >you kept it in the root directory or in a COMSPEC directory. Even if you >installed it as a device driver in CONFIG.SYS, DOS 4.01 still complained. On What we have here is a failure to communicate. I am fully aware of the functions of share.exe, as well as the proper and improper methods of loading it. What i mean here is that using various memory mappers, i discern NO difference between having share in your root and not having it at all. OBVIOUSLY, it shows up if i load it in config.sys, in batch, or from command line. Essentially, what i am getting at is the following: Did dos 5.0 fix the FCB problem in and of itself (i.e., its own resident file handlers) and is share now only what the title implies; namely, extra "sharing" features needed for networked file systems? This would explain the lack of a warning message in the boot sequence, etc. >... Until further notice, I am keeping SHARE.EXE in my C:\. Again, until further notice, i am not just keeping it in my root, i am loading it explicitly. nye