Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!fnet!David_Wright
From: David_Wright@f170.n771.z3.fidonet.org (David Wright)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS2 coming on strong (pc-rag)
Message-ID: <9105231120.AA92725@f170.n771.z3.fidonet.org>
Date: 17 May 91 17:13:32 GMT
Reply-To: David_Wright@p4.f905.n153.z1.fidonet.org (David Wright)
Lines: 19
Comment-To: Steve_Lesner@f261.n141.z1.fidonet.org (Steve Lesner)


 SL> Then how come no articles on 2.0?  Thats the current state with OS/2 
 SL> but they continue to ignore it in favor of more windows garbage or stab 
 SL> it.

  Agreed.  If they're going to run articles on Win32, they should be 
comparing it to what OS/2 2.x is going to be in 1993, not what OS/2 1.1 was 
two years ago.  At the very least they should compare it to what OS/2 2.0 is 
today.  If they had any integrity, they wouldn't review vaporware at all.

  For the last two years I've read:  Don't buy OS/2 now, wait for the 386 
version.  Now I read:  Don't buy OS/2 now, wait for Win32.  When the 586 
ships, what will we have to wait for?

                Dave


--- msged 1.99G OS/2
 * Origin: The IdleNews  (1:153/905.4)