Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!uunet!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!fnet!Steve_Lesner
From: Steve_Lesner@f170.n771.z3.fidonet.org (Steve Lesner)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: OS2 coming on strong (pc-rag)
Message-ID: <9105231120.AA92754@f170.n771.z3.fidonet.org>
Date: 17 May 91 23:22:42 GMT
Reply-To: Steve_Lesner@f261.n141.z1.fidonet.org (Steve Lesner)
Lines: 17
Comment-To: David_Wright@f261.n141.z1.fidonet.org (David Wright)


 DW>   Then there's the Editors' choice sidebar:
 DW> 
 DW>   You can get an idea of what to expect from Lotus's Windows product by 
 DW> looking at Freelance Graphics for OS/2.____Unfortunately, the huge 
 DW> memory appetite, sluggish performance, and shortage of drivers of the 
 DW> OS/2 version (a real drawback of using OS/2 today) make it impossible 
to 

Thats exactly what I was trying to tell Wynne.  Thanks for re-emphazing that 
article.  In the last few months (and most of a year or so) PC-Mag is filled 
with this sort of OS/2 stabbing.  I'm glad I'm not the only one that has the 
ability to see the "anti-os/2" gist of that magazine.


--- Maximus-CBCS v1.02.OS/2.B0
 * Origin: Uh Huh, OS/2, I've got the right one Baby, Uh Huh (1:141/261)