Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!uunet!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!fnet!Joe_Salemi
From: Joe_Salemi@f170.n771.z3.fidonet.org (Joe Salemi)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: OS/2 2.0
Message-ID: <9105231120.AA92761@f170.n771.z3.fidonet.org>
Date: 18 May 91 02:27:33 GMT
Reply-To: Joe_Salemi@p1.f136.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Joe Salemi)
Lines: 14
Comment-To: Mark_Ryland@p1.f136.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Mark Ryland)

In a message to Ralph Scowden <13 May 91 13:27> Mark Ryland wrote:

 MR> Not quite.  The "official line" (what MS told the press in February)
 MR> is that Win32/DOS will be about as robust as OS/2 1.x/2.x -- i.e., (as
 MR> we all know), under certain conditions Ring 3 code can still hose the
 MR> system.  Win32/NT will be far more robust than current OS/2.

 MR> FWIW, I tend to believe this claim for reasons that I can't discuss.


Not because you happen to work for MS?  <g>

--- XRS! 4.14+
 * Origin: Max's Doghouse Remote Kennel /703-548-7849/ (RAX 1:109/136.1)