Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!uunet!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!fnet!Steve_Lesner
From: Steve_Lesner@f170.n771.z3.fidonet.org (Steve Lesner)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Borland
Message-ID: <9105231121.AA92783@f170.n771.z3.fidonet.org>
Date: 18 May 91 20:44:50 GMT
Reply-To: Steve_Lesner@f261.n141.z1.fidonet.org (Steve Lesner)
Lines: 15
Comment-To: Ed_Barboni@f714.n273.z1.fidonet.org (Ed Barboni)


 EB> By the time you read this, you will probably already know that BORLAND
 EB> will be developing C++ (OS/2 2.0) for IBM.

Were did you hear this?  And could you elaborate on what you mean by 
developing C++ for IBM?  Are you talking 32 bit compiler?  Are you talking 
about Borland writing a compiler for IBM to sell?  I'm confused but I think 
what you mean is they simply are writing their compiler to run under OS/2.
I'd be real interested in further material here.  I was just about ready to 
write Borland off myself and never followed up with moving from C 2.0 to C++ 
for windows for obvious reasons.


--- Maximus-CBCS v1.02.OS/2.B0
 * Origin: Uh Huh, OS/2, I've got the right one Baby, Uh Huh (1:141/261)