Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!darkstar!uunet.UU.NET
From: bcstec!shuksan!scott@uunet.UU.NET (Scott Moody)
Newsgroups: comp.os.research
Subject: Re: RPC strategies
Message-ID: <16084@darkstar.ucsc.edu>
Date: 20 May 91 16:42:40 GMT
Article-I.D.: darkstar.16084
Sender: usenet@darkstar.ucsc.edu
Organization: The Boeing Co., MMST, Seattle, Wa.
Lines: 23
Approved: comp-os-research@jupiter.ucsc.edu


In article <15843@darkstar.ucsc.edu>, abbott@aero.org (Russell J. Abbott) writes:
> I would appreciate pointers to papers that compare RPC services and
> implementation strategies.  I have been asked to investigate the claim
> that the RPC services and implementation strategies offered by different
> distributed operating systems make a significant difference in the
> effectiveness of those systems.  Any suggestions or insights would be
> appreciated.  Thanks.
> 
> Russ Abbott@aero.org


I have a bunch of papers on RPC's.  Most of the good ones
are in SIGOPS.

   A Survey of Remote Procedure Calls
       B.H. Tay, A.L. Ananda
       BITNET: taybengh@nusdics
       July 1990, SIGOPS. Vol 24, no 3
-- 
Scott Moody   "The Boeing Mountain Network"
     scott@shuksan.boeing.com
     uunet!bcstec!shuksan!scott