Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!sgi!shinobu!odin!sgihub!zola!bill-n-ted!wicinski
From: wicinski@bill-n-ted.esd.sgi.com (Tim Wicinski)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: Re: Administrative overhead of routing multiple protocols through cisco
Message-ID: <1991May19.084837.14525@zola.esd.sgi.com>
Date: 19 May 91 08:48:37 GMT
References: <9105171831.AA22334@psuoradm.cc.pdx.edu> <May.18.21.16.18.1991.13337@athos.rutgers.edu>
Sender: news@zola.esd.sgi.com (Net News)
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.  Mountain View, CA
Lines: 12

In <May.18.21.16.18.1991.13337@athos.rutgers.edu> hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu (Charles Hedrick) writes:

>reboot).  I think the next release of cisco 8.2 (expected imminently)
>will fix atalk.  The most conservative approach would be to wait for a
>month or so after release and then ask about experiences, but I'm
>pretty confident.  If you have lots of Macs there is probably no way

i have 8.2 release notes, and people here run 8.2 on routers heavily in
the igrp world, and they say appletalk seems more broken now than it did
in 8.1. i can't say, i have the release notes, but nothing else yet. 

tim