Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!cass.ma02.bull.com!mips2!bull.bull.fr!corton!mcsun!sunic!fuug!funic!nntp.hut.fi!kaira.hut.fi!s31806a
From: s31806a@kaira.hut.fi (Peter Lindblom)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: Re: Administrative overhead of routing multiple protocols through cisco
Message-ID: <1991May20.075519.7440@nntp.hut.fi>
Date: 20 May 91 07:55:19 GMT
References: <9105171831.AA22334@psuoradm.cc.pdx.edu> <May.18.21.16.18.1991.13337@athos.rutgers.edu> <1991May19.084837.14525@zola.esd.sgi.com>
Sender: usenet@nntp.hut.fi (Usenet pseudouser id)
Reply-To: s31806a@kaira.hut.fi (Peter Lindblom)
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, FINLAND
Lines: 16
Nntp-Posting-Host: kaira.hut.fi

In article <1991May19.084837.14525@zola.esd.sgi.com> wicinski@bill-n-ted.esd.sgi.com (Tim Wicinski) writes:
>
>i have 8.2 release notes, and people here run 8.2 on routers heavily in
>the igrp world, and they say appletalk seems more broken now than it did
>in 8.1. i can't say, i have the release notes, but nothing else yet. 
>

I have had a little experience with appletalk and cisco 8.2 (though a beta
version), and it seems like appletalk really is more broken than in 8.1.
Nevertheless there is atalk phase 2 support, but there is definitely some
kind of problem. Of course this might be because of beta software...

Peter Lindblom                  | home phone intl. + 358 0 468 2725
System Analyst                  | office     intl. + 358 0 7098 3045

internet: s31806a@kaira.hut.fi, pl@sun.sam.tele.fi