Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!samsung!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!hedrick From: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu (Charles Hedrick) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk Subject: Re: Administrative overhead of routing multiple protocols through cisco Message-ID: Date: 20 May 91 23:10:01 GMT References: <9105171831.AA22334@psuoradm.cc.pdx.edu> <1991May19.084837.14525@zola.esd.sgi.com> <1991May20.075519.7440@nntp.hut.fi> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 9 >i have 8.2 release notes, and people here run 8.2 on routers heavily in >the igrp world, and they say appletalk seems more broken now than it did >in 8.1. i can't say, i have the release notes, but nothing else yet. My comment applied to a second maintenance release of cisco 8.2, which I believe is not quite out yet. I agree that Appletalk support in the 8.2 initial release and first maintenance release is less than ideal. I don't remember enough about 8.1 to be able to make that comparison, but 8.2 may well be worse than 8.1.