Path: utzoo!utgpu!cunews!micor!latour!ecicrl!clewis
From: clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis)
Newsgroups: unix-pc.general,comp.sys.3b1
Subject: Re: unix-pc rmgroup due next week
Message-ID: <1514@ecicrl.ocunix.on.ca>
Date: 19 May 91 01:03:24 GMT
References: <1991May15.145918.13958@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1991May16.053820.26650@chance.UUCP> <1504@ecicrl.ocunix.on.ca> <101136@becker.UUCP>
Followup-To: unix-pc.general
Organization: Elegant Communications Inc., Ottawa, Canada
Lines: 25

In article <101136@becker.UUCP> bdb@becker.UUCP (Bruce D. Becker) writes:
>In article <1504@ecicrl.ocunix.on.ca> clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis) writes:

>|Normally, you're right - after all, who cares whether Bruce has an extra
>|empty directory and active file entry.  On the other hand, Bruce is the
>|guy who keeps newgrouping alt.swedish.chef.bork.bork.bork.

>	...another dumb remark from chris the spiky, sigh...

Gee, I don't know why you're getting all offensive Bruce, I just stated
a simple fact without any personal opinion.  (Spiky?  spiky?  Like wow,
nobody's ever called me *that* before!  I wonder what the hell it means?)

But since you bring it up, let's be *perfectly* clear, *are* you going to newgroup
the unix-pc groups if someone rmgroups them?  No beating around the bush -
what are you going to do?

[If voting doesn't apply to unix-pc groups and you seem to be threatening
to newgroup them after they were voted down, why did you rmgroup can.english
where voting doesn't apply either?  You're not very consistent]
-- 
Chris Lewis, Phone: (613) 832-0541, Domain: clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca
UUCP: ...!cunews!latour!ecicrl!clewis; Ferret Mailing List:
ferret-request@eci386; Psroff (not Adobe Transcript) enquiries:
psroff-request@eci386 or Canada 416-832-0541.  Psroff 3.0 in c.s.u soon!