Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!highspl!fithp!mhw
From: mhw@fithp (Marc Weinstein)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1
Subject: Re: v42bis 2400baud at 960cps throughput!!!
Message-ID: <1991May22.041015.13116@fithp>
Date: 22 May 91 04:10:15 GMT
References: <165@beyonet.UUCP>
Organization: Weinstein Consulting
Lines: 25

From article <165@beyonet.UUCP>, by beyo@beyonet.UUCP (Steve Urich):
> In article <1991May18.180655.2944@fithp>, mhw@fithp (Marc Weinstein) writes:
>> From article <159@beyonet.UUCP>, by beyo@beyonet.UUCP (Steve Urich):
> 	
> 	<*> [STUFF DELETED]
> 
>> >
>> > 	His throughput jumped from an approx avg. 200-226 to 317-960cps.
>> Jeez - that's a hell of a compresion ratio.  You sure you're seeing
>> this kind of compression?
>> 
> 	<*> Yes, the rate is accurate. Whats also funny is the shorter
> 	    the file the faster the rate in HDB xferstats become. Because
> 	    of the calc. it makes. The control files are really strange,
> 	    sometimes 9000bytes/sec :-))).

Yeah - I've seen stuff like a 1601 byte file, transferred in 0.001 seconds
(right!), so xferstats reports a throughput of 1601000 Bps!!!

This system is GOOD!

-- 
Marc Weinstein
{simon,royko,tellab5}!linac!fithp!mhw		Elmhurst, IL
-or- {internet host}!linac.fnal.gov!fithp!mhw