Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.datacomm:1217 comp.sys.amiga.misc:3818 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!news.larc.nasa.gov!tadguy From: tadguy@abcfd01.larc.nasa.gov (Tad Guy) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm,comp.sys.amiga.misc Subject: Re: DNET Message-ID: Date: 21 May 91 17:38:14 GMT References: <192909c8.ARN00e8@nesbbx.UUCP> <1991May19.235912.16324@maverick.ksu.ksu.edu> <5dch9bj@rpi.edu> Sender: news@news.larc.nasa.gov (USENET Network News) Organization: NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA Lines: 25 In-Reply-To: lag@aix01.aix.rpi.edu's message of 21 May 91 01: 12:29 GMT In article <5dch9bj@rpi.edu> lag@aix01.aix.rpi.edu (Jose (Lagnaf) Raffucci) writes: > >> dnet-2.20 (available via anonymous ftp from ftp.uu.net in > >> /amiga-sources/dillon/) works ok on my Sun4/75 running SunOS 4.1.1. > >> There's some timing/protocol problems when running at high speeds > >> (like 9600bps) over dirty phone lines that I haven't solved yet, but > >> other than occasional lockups, it works ok... > >> > >> ...tad > > > >I was running it on our schools dual processor Solbourne (SunOS 4.0.3D) > >and was having no problems at 9600. The biggest problem I had was in > >connecting back to the amiga from the Solbourne, if you hit the Ctrl-C key > >the dnet program on the unix side would go crazy and eat about 90% of the > >CPU. (all system calls... > > Wow... I along with 10 or so other people here have been running it off > of sun 3's for a year and a half with no problems (major ones anyways) > most of us use it at 9600 or 19200. I have found that it provides us > with the best and fastest error-free communications at these speeds. Good for you. But do you have really dirty phone lines? I doubt they're as bad as the ones I use, which are almost certainly tickling a protocol error. ...tad