Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.games:6635 rec.games.misc:16857
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!sdd.hp.com!caen!ox.com!math.fu-berlin.de!tmpmbx!lime!nicedel!amber!root
From: root@amber.north.de (Chr. Schlittchen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.games,rec.games.misc
Subject: Re: Eye of the Beholder
Message-ID: <1991May20.122859.394@amber.north.de>
Date: 20 May 91 12:28:59 GMT
References: <1991May19.011603.17830@crash.cts.com>
Organization: Private UUCP-Site
Lines: 18

uzun@pnet01.cts.com (Roger Uzun) writes:

>>> Colas Nahaboo states that EOB is a clone of DM
>Well, it is true that Eye of the Beholder plays a LOT like Dungeon Master
>and Chaos Strikes back, but EOB is MUCH MUCH improved, as a program, and
>graphically and sonically.

You must be joking. Where are all the little features which make DM/CSB
so nice to play ? ( Like the destructable and destructive doors,
or the non-standard monsters ( like the black flames )).
The graphics weren't improved much, of course the 'backgroud', eg.
the dungeon walls are more detailed, but please compare a fireball
in DM and EOB.

EOB is a rather good game, but it isn't a real classic like DM.
-- 
Christian Schlittchen
	( root@amber.north.de / j05j@sie.rz.uni-bremen.de )