Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.misc:3855 comp.sys.amiga.programmer:3804 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1 From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.programmer Subject: Re: So, how close is WB2.0 to a burn-in date? Message-ID: <1991May22.161900.26502@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Date: 22 May 91 16:19:00 GMT References: <1991May20.170355.19033@coplex.uucp> <1991May22.145109.2627@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> Sender: usenet@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Network News) Reply-To: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) Organization: Columbia University Lines: 16 Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu In article <1991May22.145109.2627@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> jap@convex.cl.msu.edu (Joe Porkka) writes: > >There is no reason not to have 2.0 on all amigas (including CDTV). >The only difference between game players and power users is the hardware >and software addons they buy for their machines. That's not really true. CDTV, running under a variant of 1.3, uses a 512K kickstart with special routines on it, so you can't just plug in a 2.0 kickstart. And considering that 2.0KS is already totally filled, there would be no room for the CDTV specific code. Now the world has gone to bed, Now I lay me down to sleep, Darkness won't engulf my head, Try to count electric sheep, I can see by infrared, Sweet dream wishes you can keep, How I hate the night. How I hate the night. -- Marvin