Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!udel!mmdf
From: fhwri%CONNCOLL.BITNET@yalevm.ycc.yale.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.multimedia
Subject: Re: Pro Page relative merits
Message-ID: <54053@nigel.ee.udel.edu>
Date: 19 May 91 21:32:54 GMT
Sender: mmdf@ee.udel.edu
Lines: 16


> Seriously folks.  Am I the only one doing desktop publishing on the Amiga
> commercially who has used dtp software extensively on other computers?  Is
> this a case of people not knowing what they're missing?
>
>                          Still baffled about this particular topic,
>                                         Julie (LadyHawke)
>
I know whereof you speak; I personally deepsixed my ProPage files when I got
ahold of Pagestream. I have seen ProPage 2.0, and it still isn't as good as
Pagestream (IMHO). I have also used Pagemaker, and, yes, it IS a lot faster
than either Amiga program, but then no Mac program can output outline fonts
to any nonlaser printer, and I have a HP Deskjet which produces terrific
results with either ProPage or Pagestream.
                                        --Rick Wrigley
                                        fhwri@conncoll.bitnet