Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!rutgers!rochester!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!prodigal.psych.rochester.edu!jea
From: jea@prodigal.psych.rochester.edu (Joanne Albano)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.multimedia
Subject: Re: Pro Page relative merits
Message-ID: <14163@ur-cc.UUCP>
Date: 20 May 91 14:27:28 GMT
References: <1991May16.192219.8185@cbnewsj.att.com> <42472@cup.portal.com>
Sender: news@uhura.cc.rochester.edu
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Rochester, Rochester NY
Lines: 15

Open letter to LadyHawk

You are complaining about the shortcomings of ProPage relative to
Pagemaker. It would be useful if you could make a summary about
such shortcomings to the general public. I do not use ProPage
professionally and I have no ability to try PageMaker but if it
were general knowledge about what useful features exist in other
software products we could all pa
apply pressure to have the AMIGA software improved.

I think since the AMIGA software is not well regarded in the DTP
industry most potential users do not buy it and so it goes.
To stop the circle a constructive comparison could be most helpful.

Joanne